The Komejech language
Introduction
Komejech is the native language spoken by the majority of the inhabitants of the Taizi islands (Ndak Ta "Dawaim", Fáralo "Dagćm") during the classical period. This language descends directly from Ndak Ta and thus is related to other contempory Edastean languages like Adāta, Naidda and Fáralo.
Sound changes from Ndak Ta
From Ndak Ta to Proto-Komejech:
-Nasal vowels were denasalised.
-[ɐ ɪ ɐɪ ɐʊ], resulting from denasalisation, became [ɛ e ɛ ɔ] respectively.
-[ɑi au] became [ɛ ɔ] respectively.
-An epenthetic [ɛ] was inserted at the begining of words starting with a consonant cluster.
-[bʷ] became [v].
-[ts] became [s] at the begining of words and after a consonant.
-[ts] became [sː] in other environments.
-Nasals where lost word-finally after a vowel (but not after a consonant).
From Proto-Komejech to Archaic Komejech:
-Nasals adopted the articulation point of a previous consonant in clusters.
-Consonants assimilated to the following obstruent or nasal to form geminates.
-[sl] became [ʃ].
-[l] became [r] after a consonant.
-[n] became [d] before [r].
-[s] and its geminated counterpart became [ʃ] after a front vowel.
-[r] became [ʒ] between vowels.
-[e] became [i] between a consonant and a vowel.
-Geminated consonants became simple at the end of words.
-Unstressed [i u] became [e o] when following the stressed syllable or in closed syllables.
-[w] became [j] at the begining of words and after a vowel.
From Archaic Komejech to Old Komojech:
-First diphthongization: stressed [ɛ ɔ] became [ie wo] in all environments.
-[kʷ ŋʷ] became [kw ŋw] respectively.
-[w] was ellided after another [w].
-First lenition: voiced occlusives became voiced fricatives between vowels or between a vowel and [r], and voiceless obstruants became voiced in the same environments.
-[ɛ ɔ] became [e o].
-[o] became [e] when following [w].
-Second diphtongization: [e o a] became [ei ou ae] when stressed or post stress, in an open syllable (velar + [w] clusters are treated as a single consonant).
-[ae] became [ie] after [ʃ],[ʒ],[l] or [r], [ai] at the end of words or before a non-obstruant, and [e] elsewhere.
-Geminated consonants became simple when following a stressed vowel.
-Second lenition: same changes as the first lenition.
-[s] became [z] at the begining of words.
-[j] became [z] at the begining of words and after a vowel.
-All geminated consonants became simple.
-Voiced obstruents where devoiced at the end of words.
-[iei] became [i].
-[s z] became [ʃ ʒ] when following [u].
-[w] was ellided between a consonant and a vowel.
-[ŋ] became [j] before a vowel and [n] at the end of words.
From Old Komejech to Classical Komejech:
-Non-sibilant fricatives were ellided before [r].
-[r] was ellided after a sibilant fricative.
-[l] became [w] at the end of words.
-Third lenition: [p t k] became [f s x] between vowels and at the end of words, then [t] became [ts] in all environments.
-First fortition: Voiced occlusives became voiceless in all enrironments.
-[ɣ] became [j] before a front vowel.
-[i] was ellided between a vowel and [j].
-[i] became [e] after or before [j].
-Second fortition: non-sibilant voiced fricatives became voiced occlusives.
-[aw ew iw ow uw] became [au eu eu ou ou], respectively.
-Word-initial unstressed vowels were ellided, except in monosyllabic words.
-Stress became consistently rendered on the initial syllabe.
-[ai ei au ou eu] simplified to [e i o u o] when the preceding syllable countained a diphthong.
-[ie] became [je].
Dialects
Phonology
Consonants
Labial | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | |
Stop | p b | t d | k g | |
Nasal | m | n | ||
Affricate | ts | |||
Fricative | f | s z | ʃ ʒ | x |
Approximant | w | l r | j |
The palatal fricatives are written š ž.
The velar fricative is written ch.
The alveolar affricate is written c.
Other consonants are written as in IPA.
Note: this phonemic transcription, used in this grammar, does not reflect the actual orthography of Komejech, which is much more complex. See the "transliteration" section for more details about this point.
Vowels
Front | Central | Back | |
Close | i | u | |
Close-Mid | e | o | |
Open | a |
Komejech has the following diphthongs: ai, ei, au, eu and ou
All vowels are written as in IPA.
Syllabic structure and distribution
Komeyech is a relatively vocalic language, with the following syllabic structure: (C)(j)V(C), consonants clusters other than C + j being strictly prohibited.
Word-initialy, voiced fricatives are much more common than their voiceless counterparts.
Occlusives, voiced fricatives, /ts/, /l/ and /j/ cannot appear word-finally.
No root (and generally, no word at all, with the exception of compounds) contains more than one diphthong. Generally, this diphthong is either on the stressed syllable or on the syllable directly following the stressed syllable, but exceptions exist.
/w/ is rare and appears exclusively word-initially.
Allophony
Stress
Stress always falls word initially.
Morphology
Consonantic mutations
Komeyech has developped an elaborated system of consonantic mutations, that we will meet in several places of the grammar.
The consonants affected are p, t, k, b, d, g, c, z, ž, r, l and j. There are three kinds of mutation: lenition, spirantisation and fortition.
Lenition | Spirantisation | Fortition | |
p | b | f | - |
t | d | - | - |
k | g/j/0* | ch | - |
b | - | f | p |
d | - | s | t |
g | - | ch | k |
c | d | s | - |
z | - | s | - |
ž | - | s | r |
r | ž | - | - |
l | - | r | - |
j | - | ch | k |
*: g before a back vowel, j before a front vowel, ellided before j.
s-/z- also frequently alternate with š-/ž-.
Whenever a i ends up being preceeded by a j, it is lowered to e.
Other mutations are considered irregular.
Nominal morphology
Komeyech nouns are inflected for number and case. The three cases, nominative, accusative, and dative, are inherited from Ndak Ta. Nouns take indefinite and definite articles, which are inflected for number and case:
Indef | Def | ||
SG | Nom | o | lu |
Acc | jo | ru | |
Dat | mo | ru | |
PL | Nom | ro | |
Acc | žo | ||
Dat | lo |
These forms have been created in analogy with nominal mutations: in Old Komejech, articles did not inflect for case. Notice that there are no plural forms for the indefinite article.
Nouns are roughly divided into 6 declension classes (the reference form of a noun is the nominative singular).
From a historical perspective, it should be noted that articles were strongly bounded with nouns during the different sound shifts, and the word boundary was pretty much inopperent, allowing normally medial only sound changes to act on initial consonants as well. This explain both why nouns have very specific mutation patterns in comparison with other parts of speech, and why they often don't start with the expected consonant in respect to sound changes.
Class I)
Includes: many nouns starting with b-, d-, g-, j-, ž- and all nouns starting in l-. These nouns go back to Ndak Ta nouns starting with p-, t-, k- before back vowel, k- before front vowel, s- and l-, respectively.
—Spirantization marks the singular accusative and dative, as well as plural nominative and accusative.
—However, the plural accusative of nouns starting in l- is instead marked by an irregular spirantization to ž-.
Examples:
bujai - nose | doubi - horn | garas - border | jerai - scribe | žužei - mouse | lachei - bone | ||
SG | Nom | lu bujai | lu doubi | lu garas | lu jerai | lu žužei | lu lachei |
Acc | ru fujai | ru soubi | ru charas | ru cherai | ru sužei | ru rachei | |
Dat | ru fujai | ru soubi | ru charas | ru cherai | ru sužei | ru rachei | |
PL | Nom | ro fujai | ro soubi | ro charas | ro cherai | ro sužei | ro rachei |
Acc | žo fujai | žo soubi | žo charas | žo cherai | žo sužei | žo žachei | |
Dat | lo bujai | lo doubi | lo garas | lo jerai | lo žužei | lo lachei |
Class II)
Includes: many nouns starting with b-, d-, g-, j- or ž-. These nouns go back to Ndak Ta nouns starting in b-, d-, g- before back vowel, g- before front vowel and r-, respectively.
—Fortition marks the singular accusative and dative, as well as the plural nominative and dative.
—However, the plural accusative of nouns starting in ž- is instead marked by an irregular depalatalization to z-.
Examples:
bjeri - leg | depei - child | gan - log | jei - road | žus - man | ||
SG | Nom | lu bjeri | lu depei | lu gan | lu jei | lu žus |
Acc | ru pjeri | ru tepei | ru kan | ru kei | ru rus | |
Dat | ru pjeri | ru tepei | ru kan | ru kei | ru rus | |
PL | Nom | ro pjeri | ro tepei | ro kan | ro kei | ro rus |
Acc | žo pjeri | žo tepei | žo kan | žo kei | žo zus | |
Dat | lo bjeri | lo depei | lo gan | lo jei | lo žus |
This class also includes two irregular nouns:
jedou - rabbit | jere - sheep | ||
SG | Nom | lu jedou | lu jere |
Acc | ru kidou | ru kjere | |
Dat | ru kidou | ru kjere | |
PL | Nom | ro kidou | ro kjere |
Acc | žo kidou | žo kjere | |
Dat | lo jedou | lo jere |
Class III)
Includes: some nouns starting with b-, ch- or s-. These nouns go back to Ndak Ta nouns starting in bw, kw- and ts-, respectively.
—No mutation, all the forms are identical.
Examples:
bi - star | ťchir - goat | silei - tooth | ||
SG | Nom | lu bi | lu chir | lu silei |
Acc | ru bi | ru chir | ru silei | |
Dat | ru bi | ru chir | ru silei | |
PL | Nom | ro bi | ro chir | ro silei |
Acc | žo bi | žo chir | žo silei | |
Dat | lo bi | lo chir | lo silei |
Class IV)
Includes: all nouns starting in m- or n-, and some nouns starting in j-. These nouns go back to Ndak Ta nouns starting in m-, n- and ng-, respectively.
—Singular accusative and plural nominative marked by an irregular mutation to j-.
—Singular dative marked by an irregular mutation to m-.
—Plural accusative marked by an irregular mutation to n-.
Examples:
mechas - brother | ťnegai - god | jaini - neck | ||
SG | Nom | lu mechas | lu ťnegai | lu jaini |
Acc | ru jechas | ru ťjegai | ru jaini | |
Dat | ru mechas | ru ťmegai | ru maini | |
PL | Nom | ro jechas | ro ťjegai | ro jaini |
Acc | žo nechas | žo ťnegai | žo naini | |
Dat | lo mechas | lo negai | lo jaini |
Class V)
Includes: some nouns starting in ž- and all nouns starting in w-. These nouns go back to Ndak Ta nouns starting in w- and in stressed au- or âu-, respectively.
—Singular accusative marked by an irregular mutation to j-.
—Singular dative marked by an irregular mutation to m-.
—Plural nominative marked by an irregular mutation to ch-.
—Plural accusative marked by an irregular mutation to s-.
—Nouns starting in ž- furthermore get an irregular plural dative in z-.
Examples:
ťžimeš - neighbour | weimu - insult | ||
SG | Nom | lu ťžimeš | lu weimu |
Acc | ru ťjemeš | ru jeimu | |
Dat | ru mimeš | ru meimu | |
PL | Nom | ro chimeš | ro cheimu |
Acc | žo simeš | žo seimu | |
Dat | lo zimeš | lo weimu |
Class VI)
Includes: all nouns starting in p-, t-, k-, f-, š- or a vowel, as well as some nouns starting in s- or ch-. These nouns go back to Ndak Ta nouns starting in mb-, nd-, ngg-, mp-, nts-, a vowel, nt- and ngk-, respectively.
Nouns of this class use prefixes instead of mutations:
—The singular accusative is marked by a prefix je- (before consonant) or j- (before vowel).
—The singular dative is marked by a prefix me- (before consonant) or m- (before vowel).
—The plural nominative is marked by a prefix je- (before consonant), g- (before back vowel) or j- (before front vowel).
—The plural accusative is marked by a prefix že- (before consonant) or ž- (before vowel).
—The plural dative is marked by a prefix sje- (before vowel) or sj- (before vowel).
Examples:
pos - color | ti - tree | kou - foot | fješe - fish | sidou - metal | šei - feeling | chi - egg | ouche - ear | imou - head | ||
SG | Nom | lu pos | lu ti | lu kou | lu fješe | lu sidou | lu šei | lu chi | lu ouche | lu imou |
Acc | ru jepos | ru ťjeti | ru jekou | ru jefješe | ru jesidou | ru ješei | ru jechi | ru jouche | ru jemou | |
Dat | ru mepos | ru meti | ru mekou | ru mefješe | ru mesidou | ru mešei | ru mechi | ru mouche | ru mimou | |
PL | Nom | ro jepos | ro ťjeti | ro jekou | ro jefješe | ro jesidou | ro ješei | ro jechi | ro gouche | ro jemou |
Acc | žo žepos | žo žeti | žo žekou | žo žefješe | žo žesidou | žo žešei | žo žechi | žo žouche | žo žimou | |
Dat | lo sjepos | lo sjeti | lo sjekou | lo sjefješe | lo sjesidou | lo sješei | lo sjechi | lo sjouche | lo sjemou |
This class also includes 3 irregular nouns:
fach - chair | ťsou - wind | je - fight | ||
SG | Nom | lu fach | lu sou | lu je |
Acc | ru jofach | ru jasou | ru jaje | |
Dat | ru mofach | ru masou | ru maje | |
PL | Nom | ro gofach | ro gasou | ro gaje |
Acc | žo žofach | žo žasou | žo žaje | |
Dat | lo sjofach | lo sjasou | lo sjaje |
Loan words tend to be integrated into one of these classes, according to the phoneme they start with:
b-, d-, g-, j-, ž- > class I or class II
l- > class I
m-, n- > Class IV
w- > Class V
p-, t-, k-, c-, f-, s-, z-, š-, ch-, r-, vowel > class VI
Names have been integrated into declension classes following the same process. This means that names rarely end up in the expected declension in respect to the original consonant they started with in Ndak Ta.
Demonstratives and quantifiers
In Komejech, these words have two forms: a weak, unstressed and uninflected form that comes before the article, and stressed, pronominal, inflected standalone forms.
Weak forms:
These forms will often require a specific number or state of definiteness.
ze - this (definite)
ke - that (definite)
pos - other
to - any (indefinite singular; derived from the discourse referencial indefinite article).
ja - (a) few (plural)
name - some (indefinite)
opa - many (plural)
ope - more (plural)
eš - a lot of (indefinite; uncountable nouns)
mi - no, none (indefinite singular)
eze - all (definite plural)
or - each (definite singular)
Standalone forms:
this | that | other | any | few | some | many | more | lot | none | all | each | ||
SG | Nom | zješ | kješ | pos | tos | naimeš | ješ | miš | eizeš | or | |||
Acc | zjen | kjen | pon | ton | naimen | jen | min | eizen | on | ||||
Dat | zjen | kjen | pon | ton | naimen | jen | min | eizen | on | ||||
PL | Nom | zjech | kjech | poudach | jach | naimech | obach | obeinach | mich | eizech | |||
Acc | zješ | kješ | poudas | jas | naimeš | obas | obeinas | miš | eizeš | ||||
Dat | zjeti | kjeti | poudasi | jatei | naimesi | obasi | obeinasi | mitei | eizesi |
Most of the singular forms have been created by analogy with those of pos, ješ and or.
Adjectives
Adjectives agree in case and number with the noun they qualify, though they show a great deal of analogical influence from the standalone demonstratives.
Each adjective belongs to one of two possible groups: thematic or athematic. Thematic adjectives have their stem ending in a vowel, and take the following endings:
Singular: -s/-n/-n
Plural: -ch/-s/-si
The singular nominative and plural accusative endings become -š if the stem ends in -e or -i.
Examples:
ata- dark | ebe- calm | ||
SG | Nom | atas | ebeš |
Acc | atan | eben | |
Dat | atan | eben | |
PL | Nom | atach | ebech |
Acc | atas | ebeš | |
Dat | atasi | ebesi |
Athematic adjectives have their stem ending in a consonant, and take the following endings:
Singular: -0/-n/-n
Plural: -ach/-as/-asi
The singular accusative and dative endings delete the final consonant stem. In the nominative singular, said consonant will often undergo a predictible mutation:
-b > -f
-d, -z > -s
-g > -ch
-ž > -š or -r
-l > -u
-m, -n, -j > 0
The vowel of the final syllable of the stem is also often altered in the singular.
Examples:
efeib- light |
keid- simple |
kežouz- dangerous |
ljeneg- pleasant |
pubež- warm |
peiž- short |
kujeil- domestic |
koum- high |
nain- dry |
zej- wet |
||
SG | Nom | efef | kes | kežos | ljenach | pubeš | per | kujeu | kou | nai | zi |
Acc | efen | ken | kežon | ljenan | puben | pen | kujen | kon | nan | zin | |
Dat | efen | ken | kežon | ljenan | puben | pen | kujen | kon | nan | zin | |
PL | Nom | efeibach | keidach | kežouzach | ljenegach | pubežach | peižach | kujeilach | koumach | nainach | zejach |
Acc | efeibas | keidas | kežouzas | ljenegas | pubežas | peižas | kujeilas | koumas | nainas | zejas | |
Dat | efeibasi | keidasi | kežouzasi | ljenegasi | pubežasi | peižasi | kujeilasi | koumasi | nainasi | zejasi |
Adjectives have a comparative form, formed by suffixing -zin- (for thematic adjectives) or -in- (for athematic ones). This new form is declined like an athematic adjective with the following endings:
Singular: -(z)i/-(z)en/-(z)en
Plural: -(z)inach/-(z)inas/-(z)inasi
For athematic adjectives, it must be noted that this suffix goes on the full stem, the one used with the plural forms. Athematice adjectives with a stem ending in -g have that consonant changed into -j before that suffix. Futhermore, the -i of the suffix becomes -e after -j.
Adjectives also have a superlative form, formed by suffixing -jele, both for thematic and athematic adjectives. In the latter case, the final consonant of the stem is erased (except if this consonant is -m or -n, in which case it is the j- of the suffix which is erased), and any eventual stem final diphthong loses its final glide. This suffix declines like a thematic adjective.
Additionally, any adjective directly following the adverb ja ("very") undergoes spirantization if applicable. If it starts with a vowel, it receives a prefix l- instead. (atas "dark" > ja latas "very dark").
Personnal pronouns
Personnal pronouns developped a contrast between so-called "strong" and "weak" forms. The exact use of these different forms is complex and will be covered in the syntax section.
1st | ť2nd | 3rd | |||||
Strong | Weak | Strong | Weak | Strong | Weak | ||
SG | Nom | izei | i | ljekos | cos | ejei | as |
Acc | eizi | e | ljekon | con | agai | an | |
Dat | imei | e | ljekon | con | agai | an | |
PL | Nom | ichech | ech | ljekoch | coch | agach | ach |
Acc | išeš | eš | ljekos | cos | agas | as | |
Dat | imesi | esi | ljekosi | cosi | agasi | asi |
Weak forms of 1st and 3rd persons derive more or less straightforwardly from unaccented forms of the original Ndak Ta pronouns, with visible analogical influence from the determiners and adjectives; the strong forms seem to result from accented forms of the same pronouns suffixed with demonstratives. 2nd person strong forms derive from Ndak Ta formal 2nd person pronouns, with again some analogy.
2nd person weak forms, however, constitute an anomaly. Expected forms would have been starting in t-, instead of c-. It seems that proto Komejech had two alternative forms for the non formal 2nd person pronoun: a regular, expected form *do, and an alterated form *to, most probably under the influence of the 2SG pronoun of Early Doroh, "toɲ". Both forms are well attested in Old Komejech, but as the original pronoun became more and more similar looking with the reflex of Ndak Ta "ndo" (discourse-referential indefinite pronoun, meaning "any" in Komejech), it progressively started to lose ground and finally disapeared completly, surviving only as a prepositional inflection.
Relative pronoun
There's only one relative pronoun:
who, which, that | ||
SG | Nom | roume |
Acc | roumi | |
Dat | roumi | |
PL | Nom | roumach |
Acc | roumas | |
Dat | roumasi |
Interrogative pronoun
who, which, what | ||
SG | Nom | izai |
Acc | izei | |
Dat | izei | |
PL | Nom | izach |
Acc | izas | |
Dat | izasi |
As with the demonstrative and quantifiers, there is a weak, uninflected form: iza.
Pro-forms
A lot of variations are to be observed in the pro-adverb forms.
Interrogative | Demonstrative | Quantifier | |||||||
Proximal | Distal | Existential | Free choice | Universal | Distributive | Negative | |||
Determiner | iza | ze | ke | name | to | eze | or | mi | |
Pronouns | Person/thing | izai | zješ | kješ | naimeš | tos | eizeš | or | miš |
Pro-adverbs | Location | maile mala |
zelou | kilou kelou |
narou | toulu tolou |
eilu elou |
orou | mailu malou |
Time | zoule zola |
zežou zešo |
nabou napo |
touzu toso |
ežou ešo |
ozou | mazou maso |
||
Manner | ibai iba |
zif zef |
naimef namef |
touzef tozef |
eizef ezef |
ozef | |||
Reason | tuzai tuza |
zidou zetu |
nabou napu |
madou matu |
Prepositions
Each preposition governs a specific case.
Prepositions governing the nominative:
au - without, except
ech - of, belonging to
ju - as, like
of - with (commitative sense)
zo - intended for, concerning
Prepositions governing the accusative:
ne - in, inside, among
peku - between, among (from *mbenggu, an alteration of Ndak Ta "mbembu")
poka - behind, at the end of
san - near to, by, around
se - with (instrumental sense)
u - made of
Prepositions governing the dative:
kežes - as far as, up to, until
lida - through, throughout
rape - along, via, during
ta - into
za - out of, from
ža - towards
When used in conjunction with the weak forms of personal pronouns, prepositions have special inflected forms.
Each preposition has a double stem, one used before pronominal starting in a vowel, and the other before pronominal endings starting with a consonant.
The choice of the prononminal ending depends of the case governed by the prepositions. Futhermore, each series is devided into two sets of endings, labelled "a" and "b".
Each of the two stems of a preposition is associated with a set.
Prepositional stems:
au > al-(a)/a-(b)
ech > eg-(a)/e-(b)
ju > j-(b)/ju-(a)
of > ob-(a)/o-(b)
zo > zaz-(b)/zo-(a)
ne > n-(b)/ne-(a)
peku > pek-(b)/peku-(a)
poka > pok-(b)/poka-(a)
san > san-(b)/sana-(a)
se > s-(b)/se-(a)
u > um-(a)/u-(b)
kežes > kežid-(a)/keže-(b)
lida > lid-(b)/lida-(a)
rape > rap-(b)/rape-(a)
ta > t-(b)/ta-(a)
za > z-(b)/za-(a)
ža > ž-(b)/ža-(a)
Pronominal endings:
Nominative | Accusative | Dative | ||||
a | b | a | b | a | b | |
1SG | -i | -e | -i | |||
2SG | -do | -to | -do | -to | -do | -to |
3SG | -a | |||||
1PL | -ech | -eš | -i | |||
2PL | -doch | -toch | -dos | -tos | -do | -to |
3PL | -ach | -as | -a |
Thus, the preposition au would have the inflected forms ali, ato, ala, alech, atoch, alach.
The preposition ech is a bit irregular:
ech + 1SG > eje instead of *egi
ech + 1PL > ejech instead of *egech
Conjunctions
fo - because, because of
ju - as
koso - so, thus, therefore
lech - nor
lere - when (from *laidle, diminutive of Ndak Ta "laid", year)
mes - or
nete - then
o - and
rafe - instead of
se - in favor of
tau - but, however
za - after
ža - before
zaje - if, whether (from Ndak Ta "iwa" which + "ke" one)
zo - that
When the conjunction o precedes the indefinite article in the singular nominative (also o), they both contract to the single form no.
Numerals
Cardinal | Ordinal | |||||
+10 | x10 | +10 | x10 | |||
1 | kei | rokei | rou | keidos | rokeidos | roudos |
2 | je | rojei | ježou | jedos | rojeidos | ježoudos |
3 | zos | rolos | zožou | zouzudos | rolouzodos | zožoudos |
4 | pu | robou | pužou | pudos | roboudos | pužoudos |
5 | tei | rodou | teižu | taizudos | rodaizodos | teižudos |
6 | eš | rouleš | ežou | ešoudos | roulešodos | ežoudos |
7 | mai | ronai | marou | maimoudos | ronaimodos | maroudos |
8 | zun | rozon | zunežo | zunoudos | rozounodos | zunežodos |
9 | neu | roneu | nirou | niloudos | roneilodos | niroudos |
10 | rou | ježou | ibei | roudos | ježoudos | ibeidos |
The expected form of rokei (11) would have been *rojei, identical to 12, so a new form was created by analogical refection. In the western islands, this form is in competition with the expected rogei.
Analogy also lead to zožou (30) instead of the expected *zozou.
The ordinal forms have been created by suffixing the Ndak Ta verb "oto", to come, in the now no longer productive past imperfective.
Verbal morphology
Verbs in Komejech have considerably simplified compared to Ndak Ta. Common verbs loose tense and number categories altogether, retaining only aspect and mood.
Aspect.
Verbs know two aspects, imperfective and perfective. The former is unmarked, while the later is normally marked with the suffix -be:
zejeida (to confuse) > zejeidabe
If the verb ends in a consonant and is not monosyllabic, the last consonant is erased and the suffix becomes -pe:
amos (to walk) > amope
However, verbs ending in -m or -n keep their final consonant and receive the suffix -abe:
jepam (to melt) > jepamabe
If the verbs is monosyllabic, the suffix becomes -bei (an eventual final consonant is erazed without affecting the suffix):
pi (to joke) > pibei
bas (to sweat) > babei
If the verbs is monosyllabic but contains a diphthong, the suffix becomes -bi:
tei (to touch) > teibi
Monosyllabic verbs ending in -m or -n take the suffix -ebe:
jen (to keep) > jenebe
Finally, there are a number of irregular verbs, with unexpected outcomes in the formation of the perfective (they generally come from Ndak Ta verbs ending in -m, -n, -ng (not in a cluster), -l or having irregular stress):
aili (to break) > ailepe
cabai (to accuse) > cabape
chjepon (to reject) > chjepojabe
eižu (to take) > eižope
erai (to write) > erape
ežei (to play) > ežepe
ibei (to fold) > ibepe
itei (to lose) > itepe
kezeu (to look) > kezepe
ki (to bite) > kjebi
kipau (to cry) > kipape
kjeu (to dress) > kjebi
li (to flow) > ljebi
negai (to strike) > negape
nilei (to judge) > nilepe
oreizo (to start) > oreizape
oubjo (to offer) > oubjape
pau (to be loud) > pabei
pižei (to decide) > pižepe
pomou (to flee) > pomope
použu (to be careful) > použope
rateu (to run) > ratebei
rjai (to learn) > rjabei
rjegu (to fill) > rjegope
šetei (to discuss) > šetepe
taiži (to warn) > taižepe
teine (to breathe) > teinape
tibai (to store) > tibape
tideu (to buy) > tidepe
tužai (to regret) > tužape
zebou (to descend) > zebope
zeibi (to whistle) > zeibepe
zeimi (to lie) > zeimepe
zideu (to wear) > zidepe
zofiš (to defeat) > zofibei
Mood
Regular verbs retained only three moods from Ndak Ta, the indicative (unmarked), the negative and the imperative (actually a merger of Ndak Ta imperative and hortative).
Formation of the negative mood:
-If the root starts with a vowel, add m-.
-If the root starts with p-, k-, b-, d-, g-, c-, z-, ž-, l- or j-, spirantization is applied.
-In all other cases, add me-.
Formation of the imperative mood:
-If the root starts with a vowel, add ž- (negative miž-).
-If the root starts with p-, t-, k-, c- or r-, lenition is applied (same for negative, with an additional prefix me-).
-In all other cases, add že- (negative miže-).
Example verbs, keinu to ask:
Negative: cheinu
Imperative: jeinu
Negative imperative: mejeinu
Negai to strike:
Negative: menegai
Imperative: ženegai
Negative imperative: miženegai
Ulje to rise:
Negative: mulje
Imperative: žulje
Negative imperative: mižulje
One might also encounter a naked imperative, consisting of the verb alone without pronoun. This form is considered "rude" by most grammarians.
Adei to be
The copula, deriving from the Ndak Ta verb meaning "to stand", is strongly irregular, as it has much more features. It agrees with the subject in person and number, distinguishes future, present and past imperfective, active and mediopassive voices, obligative, potential and irrealis moods. Historically, many forms seem to have been shortened or abbreviated by the syncope of medial syllables. This accounts a great part for the irregularities of the paradigms.
Positive | Negative | |||||||||
Indicative | Obligative | Potential | Irrealis | Indicative | Obligative | Potential | Irrealis | |||
Active | Imperfective | Present | adei adou adai adech adoch adach |
zadei zadou zadai zadech zadoch zadach |
radei radou radai radech radoch radach |
madei madou madai madech madoch madach |
šadei šadou šadai šadech šadoch šadach |
medei medou medai medech medoch medach |
||
Past | adeiži adeižo adeiža adeižech adeižoch adeižach |
beiži beižo beiža beižech beižoch beižach |
meiži meižo meiža meižech meižoch meižach |
feiži feižo feiža feižech feižoch feižach |
||||||
Future | zjadei zjadou zjadai zjadech zjadoch zjadach |
zodei zodou zodai zodech zodoch zodach |
rudei rudou rudai rudech rudoch rudach |
badei badou badai badech badoch badach |
mjadei mjadou mjadai mjadech mjadoch mjadach |
šodei šodou šodai šodech šodoch šodach |
mudei mudou mudai mudech mudoch mudach |
fadei fadou fadai fadech fadoch fadach |
||
Perfective | adeibi adeibo adeiba adeibech adeiboch adeibach |
zeibi zeibo zeiba zeibech zeiboch zeibach |
reibi reibo reiba reibech reiboch reibach |
beibi beibo beiba beibech beiboch beibach |
meibi meibo meiba meibech meiboch meibach |
šeibi šeibo šeiba šeibech šeiboch šeibach |
feibi feibo feiba feibech feiboch feibach |
|||
Mediopassive | Imperfective | Present | ajeni ajeno ajena ajenech ajenoch ajenach |
zeni zeno zena zenech zenoch zenach |
meni meno mena menech menoch menach |
šeni šeno šena šenech šenoch šenach |
||||
Future | zjeni zjeno zjena zjenech zjenoch zjenach |
zoni zono zona zonech zonoch zonach |
beni beno bena benech benoch benach |
mjeni mjeno mjena mjenech mjenoch mjenach |
šoni šono šona šonech šonoch šonach |
feni feno fena fenech fenoch fenach |
||||
Perfective | ajepi ajepo ajepa ajepech ajepoch ajepach |
zepi zepo zepa zepech zepoch zepach |
bepi bepo bepa bepech bepoch bepach |
mepi mepo mepa mepech mepoch mepach |
šepi šepo šepa šepech šepoch šepach |
fepi fepo fepa fepech fepoch fepach |
Conjunct verbs
Conjunct verbs are a small subset of verbs frequently use in composition with other verbs as a mean of derivation. In some circunstances, notably when the verb adei is used as an auxiliary, these conjunct verbs become proclitics preceding the auxiliary.
Here follows the complete list of these verbs, as well as there clitic equivalent (which always has two forms, one used before a consonant, and one before vowels):
apo (to make, create, do) > fo/faz-
eteza (to transform, push through) > ca/c-
baizi (to push, conduct, do) ba/baz-
kajou (to turn, move, remove) > e/em-
kech (to throw away, push back) > ke/keg-
kumei (to renew, start again) > ko/kum-
nanou (to cut, divise) > na/nan-
pou (to refuse, disobey) > po/pof-
ujen (to bear, carry, bring) > na/n-
Notice that the clitic form is not always etymologically related to the full form.